Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Reed

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2009No. 14 EAP 2008PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal, we consider whether the filing of a deficient appellate brief constitutes a complete denial of counsel so as to warrant a presumption of prejudice in the context of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In the instant case, the Superior Court reversed the PCRA court’s denial of Appellee Adam Reed’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”)1 on the basis that the filing of a deficient appellate brief by Reed’s direct appeal counsel created a presumption of prejudice, and, therefore, that Reed successfully established he was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. RiggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API