Legal Opinion

Forsyth County v. Shelton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 8421DC1026PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants first assign error to the denial of their motion for directed verdict, based on the insufficiency of evidence of abandonment. Upon such motion, plaintiffs evidence is taken as true, with all reasonable inferences therefrom, resolving all conflicts and inconsistencies in plaintiffs favor, and disregarding defendants’ evidence unless favorable to plaintiff or tending to clarify plaintiffs case. Koonce v. May, 59 N.C. App. 633, 298 S.E. 2d 69 (1982).

Defendants make two arguments under this assignment. First, they argue that all the evidence showed that the “nature of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Rollins v. Junior Miller Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Conway v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. JWL Investments, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Huntington Properties, LLC v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Latta v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Jirtle v. Board of Adjustment of BiscoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API