Rollins v. Junior Miller Roofing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
A motion for summary judgment may only be granted where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Yount v. Lowe, 288 N.C. 90, 215 S.E. 2d 563 (1975); Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795 (1974); Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972).
In order for a defendant’s motion for summary judgment to be granted, the defendant must produce a forecast of the evidence which he has available for presentation at trial which is sufficient, if considered alone,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Primerica Life Insurance v. James Massengill & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Branch v. High Rock Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Joe Newton, Inc. v. TullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Estate of Redding v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.