Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Junior Miller Roofing Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 8118SC303PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

A motion for summary judgment may only be granted where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See, e.g., Yount v. Lowe, 288 N.C. 90, 215 S.E. 2d 563 (1975); Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795 (1974); Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972).

In order for a defendant’s motion for summary judgment to be granted, the defendant must produce a forecast of the evidence which he has available for presentation at trial which is sufficient, if considered alone,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Primerica Life Insurance v. James Massengill & Sons Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Branch v. High Rock Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Joe Newton, Inc. v. TullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. In Re Estate of Redding v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API