Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
The primary issue here is whether a city ordinance setting forth land-use regulations on property designated a flood hazard area constitutes an unlawful exercise of the police power because it effects a “taking” of the property without just compensation in violation of the North Carolina Constitution or the United States Constitution. In addition, we determine whether such an ordinance violates the equal protection provisions of the federal and state constitutions because it allegedly benefits one class of citizens at the expense of another class. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Finch v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Emmett Adolph, Sr. v. Federal Emergency Management Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.