Legal Opinion
Riley v. Jankowski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 26, 2006No. A05-1125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this proceeding arising out of a complaint about the content of certain campaign material, relators challenge the determination of respondent Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) that relators violated Minn.Stat. §§ 21 IB.04 and .06 (2004) and must pay civil penalties. Re-lators argue that (1) the administrative-hearing process established by Minn.Stat. §§ 21 IB.31 to .37 (2004) (a) violates the separation-of-powers doctrine, (b) violates relators’ constitutional right to trial by jury, and (c) unconstitutionally intrudes on relators’ First Amendment rights; (2)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nexus v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Midland Credit Management v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Fine v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.