McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The question presented is whether an Ohio statute that prohibits the distribution of anonymous campaign literature is a “law . . . abridging the freedom of speech” within the meaning of the First Amendment.1
*337I
On April 27, 1988, Margaret McIntyre distributed leaflets to persons attending a public meeting at the Blendon Middle School in Westerville, Ohio. At this meeting, the superintendent of schools planned to discuss an imminent referendum on a proposed school tax levy. The leaflets expressed Mrs. McIntyre’s opposition to the levy.2 There is no suggestion that the text of her message was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by905 opinions
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
900 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.