Legal Opinion

Nexus v. Swift

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 2010No. A09-2060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss respondent’s defamation suit pursuant to Minnesota’s anti-SLAPP statute. The statute immunizes from liability “[ljawful conduct or speech that is genuinely aimed in whole or in part at procuring favorable government action ... unless the conduct or speech constitutes a tort or a violation of a person’s constitutional rights.” Minn.Stat. § 554.03. The district court held that to the extent the anti-SLAPP statute required the district court to determine by clear and convincing evidence whether…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Velez v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API