Nexus v. Swift
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss respondent’s defamation suit pursuant to Minnesota’s anti-SLAPP statute. The statute immunizes from liability “[ljawful conduct or speech that is genuinely aimed in whole or in part at procuring favorable government action ... unless the conduct or speech constitutes a tort or a violation of a person’s constitutional rights.” Minn.Stat. § 554.03. The district court held that to the extent the anti-SLAPP statute required the district court to determine by clear and convincing evidence whether…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Velez v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.