Meyer v. Grant
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
In Colorado the proponents of a new law, or an amendment to the State Constitution, may have their proposal placed on the ballot at a general election if they can obtain enough signatures of qualified voters on an “initiative petition” within a 6-month period. One section of the state law regulating the initiative process makes it a felony to pay petition circu-lators. 1 The question in this case is whether that provision is unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that the statute abridged appellees’ right to engage in political speech and therefore…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by651 opinions
- Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles JuddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
646 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.