Legal Opinion
Fine v. Bernstein
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 23, 2007No. A05-2393PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent filed a complaint with the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings in response to campaign materials prepared and disseminated by relator. The complaint alleged violations of the Minnesota Fair Campaign Practices Act, specifically Minn.Stat. §§ 21 IB.04 and .06 (2004). The office of administrative héar-ings found relator in violation of section 21 IB.06 because of three statements included on a campaign flyer. Relator was assessed an $800 penalty. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator Jim Bernstein (“Bernstein”) was a candidate in the November 8, 2005 election for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of the Athlete Agent Application of Donald Walthal.lCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Lewison v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019