Legal Opinion
Vanover v. Hantman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 19, 1999No. Civil Action 97-2572(TAF)PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORAND UM-OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On September 27, 1997, plaintiff was discharged from his employment by order of defendant Alan Hantman, the Architect of the Capitol (“Hantman” or “AC”). He now claims, inter alia, that the discharge deprived him of property without due process of law in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Const. Amend. V, as well as the provisions of the Architect of the Capitol Human Resources Act (hereinafter “HRA”), 40 U.S.C. § 166b-7 (West Supp.1999), Chapter 752 of the AC Personnel Manual, and the procedural mandates…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Arbitraje Casa De Cambio, S.A. De C v. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Hinton v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.