Legal Opinion
Fru-Con Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 7, 2003No. 03-1229CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Fru-Con Construction filed a bid protest challenging a contract award by the Architect of the Capitol. The Government contended that this court cannot review procurement decisions by the Architect of the Capitol because it is not a Federal agency, and because it is part of the Legislative Branch. We ruled in a related case that the Architect of the Capitol is a Federal agency for jurisdictional purposes, and that this court’s Tucker Act jurisdiction does not depend on whether the Architect of the Capitol is a part of the Legislative Branch. Bell BCI Co. v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- CCL Service Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- ACRA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- CRC Marine Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Portfolio Disposition Management Group LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Industrial Property Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Four Points by Sheraton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Crewzers Fire Crew Transport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- White Hawk Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.