Legal Opinion

United States v. Sluss

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 7, 1964No. 17,119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Before a special court-martial, the accused was arraigned on a charge of violating an order regulating possession of firearms at Loring Air Force Base, Maine (Charge I), and a charge of larceny of a Government oxygen bottle and regulator assembly (Charge II), in violation of Articles 92 and 121, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892 and 921. He pleaded guilty to the first charge and not guilty to the second. The court-martial convicted him of Charge I and, as to Charge II, found him guilty of the lesser offense of wrongful…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. NorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. RoarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. LyonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. MilesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. WestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. SateyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API