United States v. Roark
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
On the ground it had “very considerable doubt” that the evidence showed the accused intended permanently to deprive the owner of money taken by the accused, a board of review set aside the accused’s conviction of larceny. However, it affirmed findings of guilty of the lesser included offense of wrongful appropriation, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. We granted review to consider whether the new findings of fact made by the board of review support its affirmance of the lesser offense.
The accused was charged with stealing $86.00…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. NorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. HayesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. SimsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. HaywoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
4Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. KastnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. SingletaryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. O'HaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.