Legal Opinion

United States v. Peterson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 24, 1964No. 17,892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Convicted by a general court-martial of two specifications of filing a false claim for a dislocation allowance and travel by his wife and two specifications of larceny of money obtained by means of the claims, in violation of Articles 182 and 121, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 932 and 921, the accused was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, and accessory punishment. The findings of guilty and the sentence were approved by the convening authority, with provision for suspension and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. O'NealUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. BrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. SwansonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Barry Shaw v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. United States v. ProttUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. BulgerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. RiosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API