Legal Opinion
Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 2009No. A06-1233PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
The Minnesota Supreme Court has directed us on remand to address the district court’s summary judgment order concluding that two securities offerings issued by appellants Christopher Brown and funeral.com, inc. were integrated and thus not exempt from registration under Minnesota law. Minn.Stat. § 80A.08 (2006). Risdall v. Brown-Wilbert, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 723 (Minn.2008) (Risdall II). Because we conclude that these offerings are integrated under the five-factor test set forth in the Note to Rule 502(a), 17 C.F.R. § 230.502(a), we affirm.
FACTS
In March 2000, appellants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Sampair v. Village of BirchwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Limberg v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Sampair v. Village of BirchwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010