Legal Opinion
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1996No. CX-94-2249, C5-94-2501PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
James Richie and Karen Gerten commenced this action in May of 1993 alleging defamation and false light invasion of privacy. These charges were based upon a photograph shown during the November 5, 1992 telecast of The Maury Povich Show (the Show), a nationally syndicated television program. Appellant, Paramount Pictures Corp. (Paramount), produced the Show and employed the personnel who obtained the photograph and incorporated it into the Show. Appellant, Kathy Tatone, provided the photograph to the Show. Appellant, MoPo Productions Inc. (MoPo), provided the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Samuel Albert v. Salmen Loksen, Brooklyn Hospital and Karen BuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- May Yang v. Robert Half Int., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Schlegel v. Ottumwa CourierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.