Legal Opinion

Sampair v. Village of Birchwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2010No. A08-1494, A08-1505PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the application of Minn.Stat. § 541.023 (2008), also known as the Marketable Title Act (MTA), to a number of easements which have been of record over 40 years. The issue before us is whether the conclusive presumption of abandonment in the MTA operates to extinguish appellants’ interests in the easements, or whether appellants fall under the MTA’s exception for parties in possession of real estate. The parties dispute the proper standard of proof necessary to satisfy the MTA’s possession exception and who bears the burden of proof to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Lutz v. SampairSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API