Adams ex rel. Tabert v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Main, C. J.
In the original opinion in this case, 124 Wash. 356, 214 Pac. 835, there is an improvident expression or two contained in the recitals which might be construed as indicating that the defendant had the right to appeal from the denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In order that there may be no misunderstanding, it should be here stated that it was not the intention to so hold in that case. The question was not there involved and was only incidentally referred to. It is the rule that an appeal does not lie from the denial of a motion for judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Adams v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Bernhard v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Crooks v. RustWashington Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Evans v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Sellman v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.