Legal Opinion

Bernhard v. Reeves

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893No. 848PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce Cou/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

During the progress of the trial of this case a wide range of testimony was allowed to be introduced, *425and in the instructions given to the jury the court attempted to cover the questions of law properly to be submitted to the jury upon the testimony thus introduced, Avithout in any Avay limiting such instructions to the issues made by the pleadings. Under such pleadings there was no question Avhatever raised as to the manner in Avhich the plumbing had been originally done, nor as to the make or construction of the water closet. The only…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ruffner Bros. v. Dutchess InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Roe v. Standard Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Exchange State Bank v. TaberIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Adams ex rel. Tabert v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API