Legal Opinion

Adams v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1923No. 17537PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

— This is an action brought by Fred Adams, a boy nine years of age, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been *357caused by negligence chargeable to the defendant. The mother of the boy joined in the same action to recover hospital and medical expenses. The answer was in substance a general denial, with an affirmative plea of contributory negligence. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. The defendant seasonably challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a recovery. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the boy in the sum of $665, as compensation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ziomko v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Young v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Reading v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Davison v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Evans v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API