Booth v. Cottingham
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— Both parties assert that this is an agreed case under the statute; upon that theory they submit the case to us, and it was submitted to the trial court upon the same theory. Accepting, without investigation or decision, *432the statement of both parties that this is an agreed case under the statute, and taking as our guide the rule that parties are bound by the theory which they assume to be the correct one, we shall treat this case as an agreed case. Carver v. Carver, 97 Ind. 497 (516); Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Wood, 113 Ind. 544 (564); Brink v. Reid, 122 Ind. 257. "Where parties agree…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Brink v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Clark v. CaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turner v. FlaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Newman v. KiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Osborn v. EddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re DenissonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Reddick v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.