Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Osborn v. Eddington

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1935No. 26,431PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

—The appellant, relator, brought this action by a complaint in the nature of a quo warranto to determine whether the appellant or appellee was entitled to the office of county superintendent of Martin county, Indiana. Later both parties filed an agreed statement of facts, which was entitled the same as the complaint, and accompanied by an affidavit stating that the controversy in the cause was real, and that the proceedings were in good faith to determine the rights of the parties in the action.

The record shows that the cause was submitted to the court upon the agreed statement of facts and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greencastle Township v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Webb County v. Board of School TrusteesTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Sheboygan Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Campbell v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Elmore v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harris, Etc. v. MUTSCHLERIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Benton County Council v. State Ex Rel. SparksIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. STATE EX REL. McCLURE ETC. v. MARION SUP. CT. ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ford v. Madison-Grant Teachers Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Board of Trustees v. LandryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API