Clark v. Casler
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Perkins, J.- —
-Assumpsit. The declaration was by “ James Casler against Raymond W. Clark, guardian of James Hare, Sarah Ann Hare, and Isabel Hare, minor children of Thomas Hare, deceased.” It set forth that “ the defendant, guardian as aforesaid,” was indebted to the plaintiff in divers sums for the board and lodging, &c., of said minor children, furnished before that time, “ at the special instance and request of said defendant,” and that, being so indebted, he undertook and promised to pay, &c.
The defendant pleaded three pleas. 1. The general issue; 2. No assets in his hands belonging to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weir v. Weir's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1843
- Simms v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lewis v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Marquess v. La BawIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Turner v. FlaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Booth v. CottinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Elson v. SprakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.