Legal Opinion

Care & Treatment of Murrell v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 2007No. SC 87804PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

A jury unanimously found Mark Murrell to be a sexually violent predator (“SVP”) pursuant to sections 632.480-632.5131, RSMo Supp.2001. Because his appeal challenges the validity of sections 632.480-632.513, jurisdiction lies solely in this Court. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 3.

This Court holds: (1) that Missouri’s SVP statute, sections 632.480-632.513, complies with the due process protections of the United States and Missouri constitutions; (2) antisocial personality disorder (“ASPD”) can meet the definition of “mental abnormality” within the meaning of section…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Care & Treatment of Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Kivland v. Columbia Orthopaedic Group, LLPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Care & Treatment of Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. American Eagle Waste Industries, LLC v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. In Re Care and Treatment of CoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API