Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Anderson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 2007No. 20060088PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jamal Anderson appeals from a district court judgment ordering his involuntary commitment to the care and custody of the executive director of the Department of Human Services as a sexually dangerous individual. Concluding that good cause existed for delaying the commitment hearing, that no right to a jury trial exists in these proceedings, and that clear and convincing evidence exists to prove Anderson is a sexually dangerous individual, we affirm.
*572I
[¶ 2] On September 21, 2005, while Anderson was in the North Dakota State Penitentiary and about to complete his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MidgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Gaddie v. BarreraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.