Danielson v. National Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellant, a Minnesota resident, sued respondent retailer in Minnesota for injuries suffered in Arizona while using a ladder purchased from a store of respondent in Texas. The district court dismissed appellant’s claim on the grounds that it was time barred under the law of both of the other states and the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Because the district court should have applied Minnesota’s statute of limitations, and because the doctrine of forum non conveniens does not support dismissal, we reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Danielson is a Minnesota resident and operates a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. v. Sig Pack, Inc., Doboy DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- In re Grand Theft Auto Video Game Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Rapp v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.