Legal Opinion
United States v. Kemp
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided September 6, 1996No. 5:96-cv-00165PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
On July 26, 1996, Charles Richard Kemp, defendant in the above-entitled criminal case, pled guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Kemp robbed the Bank of Tuscaloosa. The only remaining issue is “restitution” pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”). By force Kemp took from the bank the sum of $4,186.00, of which $3,590.75 was recovered after Kemp briefly visited the gaming tables of Philadelphia, Mississippi. This left the bank’s out-of-pocket loss at the relatively small sum of $595.25, plus interest on the $595.25 from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Antoinette Blevins Johnson, Central Bank of the South, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. WeldenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
- Robert John Morgan, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. Charles A. Wofford, as Judge of the Superior Court of Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1996
- United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1997
- United States v. BishopDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.