Legal Opinion
United States v. Dean
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 11, 1996No. CR 96-295-MAPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
On October 7, 1996, defendant appeared for sentencing following his entry of a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 11(e)(1)(C) for knowingly and maliciously destroying real property affecting interstate commerce by fire in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). With a criminal history category of VI and an offense level of 17, the sentencing guidelines called for a sentence of 51-63 months. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 844(i), a mandatory minimum sentence of 60 months was required. By accepting the parties’ plea agreement, I agreed to sentence the defendant to .60 months…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Robert FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. ArledgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DuboseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DeAngelisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.