Legal Opinion

United States v. Antoinette Blevins Johnson, Central Bank of the South, Intervenor-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1993No. 91-7576PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

As a matter of first impression in this circuit, we hold that the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579 and 3580 (“Act”) does not afford a victim under the Act standing to appeal the rescission of a restitution order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 30, 1987, a grand jury charged Antoinette Blevins Johnson with 30 counts of forging endorsements of and cashing social security checks made payable to a deceased relative, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495. On May 19, 1987, the district court notified County Market, SouthTrust Bank, and Central Bank…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. McClure v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Huml v. VlaznyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API