United States v. Antoinette Blevins Johnson, Central Bank of the South, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
As a matter of first impression in this circuit, we hold that the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579 and 3580 (“Act”) does not afford a victim under the Act standing to appeal the rescission of a restitution order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 30, 1987, a grand jury charged Antoinette Blevins Johnson with 30 counts of forging endorsements of and cashing social security checks made payable to a deceased relative, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495. On May 19, 1987, the district court notified County Market, SouthTrust Bank, and Central Bank…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- McClure v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Huml v. VlaznyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.