Legal Opinion

United States v. Welden

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 29, 1983No. CR 83-AR-123-MPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

The Court is faced with a challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3579 and 3580, insofar as these new statutory provisions of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 purport to require “restitution” to a “victim” by a person convicted of a federal crime. In this particular case the indictment was brought under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1), the kidnapping statute. From the evidence upon which Carlton Welden, Edward Eugene Satterfield and Perry Don Allison, the three co-defendants in this case, were all convicted it appears that as to one…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Wilbert Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. William DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. ThirionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API