Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 10, 2004No. 01-4265Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
360 F.3d 519
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Anthony P. PERRY, Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-Appellant.
No. 01-4265.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: April 30, 2003.
Decided and Filed: March 10, 2004. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Karen Kelly Grasso, THOMPSON HINE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.
Christian H. Stickan (argued and briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, Frank J. Witschey, Witschey & Witschey, Akron, Ohio, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Karen Kelly Grasso, Robert M.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Clay; Dissent.
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.