State v. Schmieg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appeal by the state from an order by the County Court of Carver County, granting defendant-respondent’s pretrial motion to suppress an alleged incriminating statement made by the defendant (Schmieg) while Schmieg was in custody and during a telephone conversation which the Minnesota Implied Consent Law affords the defendant. Upon prosecution’s oral notice, a stay was granted to allow the state to appeal the pretrial order. The charge is DWI, a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1983).
The trial court did not identify the basis for its order to suppress. The state…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KisseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BeezleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. EisenbacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.