Legal Opinion

State v. Schmieg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 22, 1984No. CX-83-1803PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appeal by the state from an order by the County Court of Carver County, granting defendant-respondent’s pretrial motion to suppress an alleged incriminating statement made by the defendant (Schmieg) while Schmieg was in custody and during a telephone conversation which the Minnesota Implied Consent Law affords the defendant. Upon prosecution’s oral notice, a stay was granted to allow the state to appeal the pretrial order. The charge is DWI, a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1983).

The trial court did not identify the basis for its order to suppress. The state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KisseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. BeezleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. EisenbacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API