Legal Opinion

State v. Helenbolt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1979No. 49956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, subd. 1, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court denying a motion by the state to compel testimony by defendant’s alleged accomplice at defendant’s trial without granting the accomplice immunity from prosecution. The defendant, in a motion to dismiss, argues that the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the trial court erred in its decision and that the court’s ruling will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. Although we deny the motion to dismiss, we agree that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HelenboltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. SchmiegCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API