Legal Opinion

State v. Kim

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1985No. C4-85-828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s eviden-tiary ruling in a prosecution for third and fourth degree criminal sexual conduct. The trial court ruled that testimony about the population frequency of certain genetic markers that were identified through electrophoresis testing of dried semen stains was not admissible. Respondent Joon Kyu Kim seeks review of an evidentiary ruling that electrophoresis met the Frye' 1 standard for scientific acceptance and that the results of such tests are admissible.

Kim argues that the State failed to establish that the suppression ruling…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. PelovskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Joon Kyu Kim v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. AltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API