Legal Opinion

Beck v. City of Tillamook

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1992No. LUBA 90-056; CA A67345; SC S37906PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

This case concerns the scope of judicial review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). Specifically, the issue is this: When petitioners appealed a local land use decision to LUBA and prevailed only in part, obtaining a remand, did the applicable statutes require them to seek judicial review of the legal issues that LUBA decided against them at that time, or could they wait until after the remand and a second appeal to LUBA to do so? The Court of Appeals held that the applicable statutes required petitioners to seek judicial review when the issues were “conclusively decided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Beck v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Doney v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Schatz v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. City of Omaha v. WadeNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API