Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Larson v. Wallowa County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1992No. LUBA 92-008; LUBA 92-009; LUBA 92-011; LUBA 92-013; CA A76297PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners 1 seek review of, and some of respondents cross-petition from, LUBA’s remand of Wallowa County’s decision that allowed respondents Dan Gile and Associates’ (Gile) and Lakeside Development Co.’s (Lakeside) application to rezone property from exclusive farm use to recreational-residential and for approval of a preliminary subdivision plat for the property.

The principal contention in 1000 Friends’ appeal to LUBA was that the rezoning of the property violated the county’s comprehensive plan. The parties appear to agree that the proposed residential development would not be permissible…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heavirland v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. West v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API