Legal Opinion
Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 3, 2010No. 2009100; A145336PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Intervenors Bradwood Landing LLC and NorthernStar Energy LLC applied to Clatsop County for land use approvals that were necessary to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and a natural gas pipeline to serve the terminal. In March 2008, the county adopted an ordinance that enacted the zone and comprehensive plan map amendments and related development approvals needed to facilitate the projects. Petitioners, various organizations and individuals opposed to the amendments and approvals, appealed the ordinance to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on a number of grounds.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friends of the Hood River Waterfront v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Lennar Northwest, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010