Odya v. Quade

Appellant asserts that none of the reasons given by the court is sufficient for a new trial. The inter- pleaded defendant contends that the cross complaint against it should have been dismissed because there is no evidence of causal negligence on the part of Odya. It and the plaintiff contend that in any event there were errors upon the trial which warranted a new trial.

Our analysis of the record leads us to the following conclusions :(1) The evidence considered in the light of the presumptions applicable to drivers deceased or suffering from retrograde amnesia established that the collision…