Legal Opinion

Frey v. Dick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1956PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff Frey seek reversal on this appeal on the ground that the negligent speed and lookout on the part of the host Dick were momentary in *6character and could not be assumed by the guest as a matter of law. In support of such position there are cited the cases of Diersen v. Staven (1956), 271 Wis. 519, 74 N. W. (2d) 158; Wibbeler v. Reed (1953), 265 Wis. 141, 60 N. W. (2d) 700; and Wheeler v. Rural Mut. Casualty Ins. Co. (1952), 261 Wis. 528, 53 N. W. (2d) 190.

Ordinarily it is true that negligent lookout on the part of a host-driver is momentary in character, and, when such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNamer v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Erickson v. PughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Wheeler v. Rural Mutual Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wibbeler v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Diersen v. StavenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Baird v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bronk v. MijalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Odya v. QuadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Baker v. Herman Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API