Atkinson v. Huber
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
' Gehl, J.
Defendant contends (1) that the jury was given an erroneous instruction; (2) that the court erred in refusing to strike certain testimony from the record; and (3) that the award of $25,000 to the husband for loss of services, society, and assistance, is so excessive as to disclose perversity which requires a new trial.
Defendant was driving south and Mrs. Atkinson north on Highway 22 in Columbia county. The cars collided at or near the south extremity of a northwest-southeast curve in the highway. As a result of the injuries sustained Mrs. Atkinson was unable to remember the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bethke v. DuweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Vogel v. VettingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Hunter v. Sirianni Candy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Bassil v. FayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Kreft v. CharlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Theisen v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Evjen v. Packer City Transit Line, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.