Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Huber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' Gehl, J.

Defendant contends (1) that the jury was given an erroneous instruction; (2) that the court erred in refusing to strike certain testimony from the record; and (3) that the award of $25,000 to the husband for loss of services, society, and assistance, is so excessive as to disclose perversity which requires a new trial.

Defendant was driving south and Mrs. Atkinson north on Highway 22 in Columbia county. The cars collided at or near the south extremity of a northwest-southeast curve in the highway. As a result of the injuries sustained Mrs. Atkinson was unable to remember the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bethke v. DuweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Vogel v. VettingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hunter v. Sirianni Candy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bassil v. FayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Kreft v. CharlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rausch v. BuisseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Theisen v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Evjen v. Packer City Transit Line, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API