Cullen v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
All three of the accused men were charged as principals, although Mr. Howard and Mr. Ward appear to be the ones who physically entered The Beloit Thrift Center. It is not claimed that Mr. Cullen actually entered the building, but he allegedly assisted in the planning and was in the vehicle which was used in connection with the burglary.
Several of the contentions advanced upon this writ of error relate only to Mr. Cullen; others concern all three defendants. All defendants were represented by counsel and were convicted after pleas of not guilty. We will consider the various contentions raised.
W…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Pollack v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jung v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ShearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. DiMaggioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.