Legal Opinion

Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1954No. 32414PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This started as an action on an open account for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered, but the cross-complaint raised the issue of damages for the violation of an exclusive distributorship contract.

Far West Equipment Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as Far West, became the exclusive sales agent and distributor for chain saws manufactured by the Mall Tool Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as Mall, in certain “protected” territory which was changed in extent from time to time. (By “protected” is meant that Far West would receive credit for any sales made…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Fiorito v. GoerigWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Federal Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. HockWashington Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API