Cochrane v. Forbes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This case was before us in 257 Mass. 135, and also in 265 Mass. 249. It now is presented by report on the correctness of a clause touching interest in an interlocutory decree entered on January 30, 1929, whereby the defendants were ordered to pay a specified sum "with interest from December 15, 1920.” Other matters included in this interlocutory decree are not reported. The case first was here on report as to the correctness of an interlocutory decree. That decree did not specify any sum of money to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs; it laid down some general principles for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Laughlin v. HopkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Winchell v. Plywood Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.