Legal Opinion
Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of Ohio
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1989No. 88-1169PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This appeal raises four issues for our disposition.
I
The first issue is whether MRDD is a person under R.C. 119.01(F) and thus a party with the right under R.C. 119.12 to appeal a decision of the State Employment Relations Board.
R.C. 119.12 provides, in pertinent part: “Any party adversely affected by any order of an agency issued pursuant to [an] * * * adjudication may appeal to the court of common pleas of Franklin county * * *.”
“Party” is defined in R.C. 119.01 (G) as “the person whose interests are the subject of an adjudication by an agency.” “Person” is defined in R.C. 119.01(F) as “a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Franklin County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Fraternal Order of Police, Capital City Lodge No. 9Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Greene Cty. Agricultural Soc. v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.