Legal Opinion

City of Riverside v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 2010No. 10AP-126PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

French, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas’ entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, the city of Riverside, declaring R.C. 718.01(H)(11) unconstitutional. For the following reasons, we reverse.

*772{¶ 2} On August 22, 2008, the city filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas for a declaratory judgment that R.C. 718.01(H)(11) is unconstitutional. The city alleged that R.C. 718.01(H)(11) “is contrary to 4 U.S.C. §§ 105 et seq. (commonly referred to as the Buck Act), the Equal Protection Clauses of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Bright Horizons Children's Ctrs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Natalie Khawam v. Grayson P. WolfeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Yost v. Volkswagen AktiengesellschaftOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Broadmoor Ctr., L.L.C. v. DallinOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Oakley v. Ohio State Univ. Wexner Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API