Legal Opinion

Thaxton v. Medina City Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1986No. 84-1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

I

The threshold question raised by this appeal is whether a public board of education is a “person” for purposes of the Valentine Act, R.C. Chapter 1331. R.C. 1331.01(A) defines “person” as follows:

*57“ ‘Person’ includes corporations, partnerships, and associations existing under or authorized by any state or territory of the United States, and solely for the purpose of the definition of division (B) of this section, a foreign governmental entity.”

We hold that a public board of education is not a “person,” as defined in R.C. 1331.01(A), when the board operates within its clear legal authority.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. CoumantarosDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1958

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  3. Avon Lake City School District v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Beifuss v. Westerville Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Louis Trauth Dairy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API