Legal Opinion

Meadors v. Still

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 29, 2001No. 00-619PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

This appeal brought by appellant Lesta Meadors is from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Dr. Eugene F. Still. On appeal, Meadors questions the standard of review utilized by the trial court in granting summary judgment and urges that the trial court erred in determining that her cause of action was not fraudulently concealed by Still’s actions. We disagree that reversal is warranted, and we affirm the trial court.

Lesta Meadors was a forty-one-year-old woman at the time she filed her first complaint in this matter in 1999. She had been born with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Crockett v. EssexSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Swietlowich v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bomar v. MoserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Paine v. Jefferson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Curry v. ThornsberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Brawn v. Oral Surgery AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API