Legal Opinion
Curry v. Thornsberry
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 6, 2003No. 03-285PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Appellants Howard and Linda Curry petition for review from a court of appeals opinion affirming a directed verdict against them. The Currys purchased a home in the Lakehill Subdivision in Pope County in June of 1991. The house they bought had been built in 1987 by William Thornsberry and a partner, Lee Taylor. On March 17, 1995, the Currys filed suit against Thornsberry, alleging that Thornsberry had been negligent in the construction of the house. Particularly, the Currys asserted that the soil underlying the Lakehill Subdivision was composed of “Enders soil,” a type of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Metropolitan Air Research Testing Authority, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- FMC CORPORATION, INC. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Mangrum v. PigueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Rice v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. Structural Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Delanno, Inc. v. PeaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.