Legal Opinion

Adams v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1998No. 96-1350, 96-1470, 96-1415, 96-1407, 96-1355, 96-1354, 96-1414, 96-1406, 96-1409, 96-1408, 96-1405 and 96-1365PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

These twelve cases involve identical core issues. By agreement of the parties, the cases were orally argued and submitted simultaneously. In the interest of efficiency, we dispose of them in a single opinion. All appellants were patients (or their spouses) of the appellee doctors, Drs. James Arthur and Allan Godo. The appellants underwent anterior cervical fusion surgeries. In performing the surgeries, the doctors used hydroxylapatite, known by the trade name “Orthoblock,” as a spacer in the spine.

Following their respective surgeries, appellants filed…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Allrid v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Carter v. HartensteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. George v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Shelton Ex Rel. Piccirilli v. FiserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API