Legal Opinion

Brawn v. Oral Surgery Associates

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 14, 2003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] Twenty-one plaintiffs (plus thirteen spouses) 1 appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Delahanty, J.) granting the defendants’ motion for a summary judgment. The nineteen plaintiffs suing Oral Surgery Associates (OSA) and Lewis N. Estabrooks, O.M.D., Carlton E. Fairbanks, D.M.D., Russell J. Collett, D.D.S., and David J. Moyer, D.D.S., M.D. (hereinafter “the OSA defendants”) contend the court erred when it concluded that the plaintiffs’ negligence claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that they had not generated a genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Rohrabaugh Ex Rel. Cross v. WagonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hughes v. GlaeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Picher v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. Foster v. Oral Surgery Associates, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. McKinnon v. Honeywell International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Drilling & Blasting Rock Specialists, Inc. v. Paul RheaumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Fitzgerald v. HutchinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API